Tuesday, June 15, 2010

Scholars Weigh MacPherson's Research

Guest Contributor
Dave MacPherson

        (MacPherson Gets “Thumbs Up” From Many Bible Scholars)

     It’s an honor (again) to have distinguished author and writer, Dave MacPherson, choosing our blog site to share some Good News! (Joe Ortiz)

"Scholars Weigh My Research"    
by Dave MacPherson

     I love to visit my dear friend Joe Ortiz’ blog, and thank him for the opportunity to contribute important information I have on my mind. I’m not a blogger but I am writing about the distortions being put forth by many who don’t have the real facts about the origin of the Pre-Tribulation Rapture to Heaven theories that abound amid our Christian community. We all have various ministries and I’m grateful for Joe Ortiz’ work with this blog, and for writing two great books that strongly affirm my contention that the Pre-Tribulation Rapture to heaven doctrine has no biblical legs to stand on.
     First of all, I trust God and thank Him and the Holy Spirit for providing me comfort and guidance throughout the years of my research and commentaries concerning the Rapture, and for the gift and ability to write the various books I have presented thus far. In my heart and soul, I feel there is no need to defend myself about the information I have presented in the past. I stand on the factual merits of my research. But, yet, many folks (especially my critics) attack my work and sometimes we need to provide testimony from those who have read and studied them to get their opinion. For this reason (and only this reason) do I provide the following information.
     For more than 30 years my pretrib critics have falsely claimed that leading scholars condemn my research. Since those critics are in effect slamming poor, helpless, long-departed Margaret Macdonald, I hereby come to her defense with a few of the many reactions from scholars who generally haven't had a huge axe to grind either for or against the pretrib rapture view. These comments are not boasting on my behalf (although I am extremely grateful to the authors for their comments); but, I merely want to go on record about the caliber of those who have read my material and who are publically willing to attest to its veracity. My usual practice, by the way, has been to obtain permission when quoting personal letters:

Loraine Boettner (theologian, author): "I think that you have done a magnificent job in showing the real origin of the Pre-trib rapture theory."

F. F. Bruce (theologian, encyclopedia contributor): "It is strange that Darby should acknowledge his indebtedness to a young lady in Limerick and say nothing about the young lady in Port Glasgow [that is, not acknowledge her pre-Antichrist rapture of part of the church]....If this work of yours can do anything to counter the influence of Hal Lindsey..., you will have rendered a signal service."

Superficial----and even devious----scholarship loves to repeat Bruce's 1975 surmise that pretrib was "in the air in the 1820s and 1830s." Hired critic Thomas Ice knows that this wasn't a scientific conclusion (does reliable data rest literally "in the air"?), and Ice moreover has ignored Bruce's later statements complimenting my evidence! Dr. Bruce even wrote a nice foreword to one of my books.

Gary DeMar (theologian, author): "THE RAPTURE PLOT is the never-before-told, true story of the plot----how plagiarism and subtle document changes created the 'mother of all revisionisms.' A fascinating piece of detective work."

Robert H. Gundry (theologian, author): "As usual, Dave MacPherson overwhelms his critics with a superior knowledge of the primary sources. His is a rare combination of historical research and investigative reporting. Those who would refute him have failed to outhustle him, especially in the tracking down of information uncatalogued in academic libraries."

Superficial scholarship is aware that the first----1973----printing of Gundry's THE CHURCH AND THE TRIBULATION stated on pp. 185, 187: "The likelihood is that Edward Irving was the first to suggest the pretribulational rapture....the outpouring on Margaret Macdonald did not include revelation of a pretribulational rapture...." But careful scholarship has long known that after Gundry saw my Macdonald findings, he deleted his Irving statement and substituted only favorable comments about the Scottish lassie----changes appearing in his classic work since the 1980's!

John H. Kromminga (Calvin Sem. president emeritus): "The material appears to be well researched, and this impression is confirmed by the excellent comments you cite from well-established evangelical commentators."

Francis Nigel Lee (theologian with eleven earned doctorates!): "Dave MacPherson, in his various books, has made a major contribution toward vindicating Historic Christian Eschatology. The 1830 innovations of the disturbed Margaret Macdonald documented by MacPherson - in part or in whole - immediately spread to Edward Irving and his followers, then to J. N. Darby and Plymouth Brethrenism, and were later popularized by the dispensationalistic Scofield Reference Bible, by Classic Pentecostalism, and by latter-day pretribulationists like J. F. Walvoord and Hal Lindsey."

Harold Lindsell (church historian, author): "...must reading for anyone who is interested in the [pretrib] origins...."

C. S. Lovett (pastor, author): "You have to be, in my opinion, the world's authority on Margaret."

Peter Marshall (pastor, author): "I am in emphatic agreement with you on your thesis."

Walter Martin (researcher, author): "[MacPherson has produced] a fascinating historical detective story...with surprising and not easily refutable conclusions."

J. Gordon Melton (editor): "According to the best scholarship available, the pretribulation, premillennial eschatology originated among members of the Catholic Apostolic Church as a result of a vision and revelation to Margaret MacDonald. See Dave MacPherson, THE UNBELIEVABLE PRE-TRIB ORIGIN." (ENCYCLOPEDIA OF AMERICAN RELIGIONS, 1978)

Gary North (author, church historian): "...Dave MacPherson has inflicted a deep wound on the pre-trib camp by showing that a teenage Scottish girl named Margaret Macdonald...came up with this doctrine...." (Dispensationalism in Transition, Nov., 1988)

Harold J. Ockenga (theologian, author): "You have done your research well."

J. I. Packer (author, church historian): "From my own explorations of the origins of Darbyism I judge that you are presenting facts fairly, and I am glad you are, for I also regard dispensationalism as an unhappy aberration."

J. Barton Payne (theologian, author): "MacPherson has once and for all overthrown Ernest Sandeen's assertions that the Irvingites never 'advocated any doctrine resembling the secret rapture' and that to connect J. N. Darby and early dispensationalism with Irving's church is 'a groundless and pernicious charge'....For serious students of the history of dispensationalism the study of MacPherson's discoveries has become a must." (Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, Winter, 1974)

The Prairie Overcomer (Canada): "...MacPherson's case seems to be watertight." (July, 1974)

Reformed Review: "MacPherson has done excellent historical research." (Spring, 1985)

Ian S. Rennie (author, church historian): " is likely that [Margaret's revelation] was grist for Darby's mill." (DREAMS, VISIONS AND ORACLES, 1977)

R. J. Rushdoony (theologian, author): "Dave MacPherson has been responsible for major change in the eschatology of evangelical churches by his devastating studies of some of the central aspects thereof. In THE RAPTURE PLOT MacPherson tells us of the strange tale of 'rapture' writings, revisions, cover-ups, altercations, and confusions. No one has equalled MacPherson in his research on the 'pre-trib rapture.' Attempts to discredit his research have failed...."

The Seminary Review: "[MacPherson] shows conclusively that Margaret Macdonald was the originator of the concept." (June, 1984)

Oswald J. Smith (pastor, author): "You have some excellent thoughts here that will be difficult to answer."

Merrill C. Tenney (theologian, author): "...the connection between Margaret Macdonald and Irvingites and Brethren is reasonably well established. You have done a valuable piece of research."

The Witness (oldest & largest Darbyist Brethren magazine in England): "What [MacPherson] succeeds in establishing is that the [pretrib] view outlined was first stated by a certain Margaret Macdonald...early in 1830." (April, 1974)
     I am truly humbled by these glowing comments from so many of our most cherished Christian authors and scholars. The critics who have tried to cover up the above scholarship are basically the ones who've tried to muddy the waters by "discovering" hints of pretrib before 1830. For more on this, see my internet article entitled "Deceiving, And Being Deceived," by Dave MacPherson
     Oh! By the way; I recently sent out another review to many of my dear friends and eschatology associates about Joe Ortiz’ two recently published books, which I recently finished reading again. Here it is:

"If Christians are tired of a contradictory and splintered end-time view that was never a part of any official Christian theology book before 1830, then they are undoubtedly ready for a sensible, down-to-earth, and thoroughly Scriptural presentation that can be found in two books on Bible prophecy authored by long-time media personality Joe Ortiz. I refer to The End Times Passover and Why Christians Will Suffer 'Great Tribulation (Author House Publishing). They are truly unique books that I obtained some time ago - books that you and your friends will treasure forever!" (Dave MacPherson, June 2, 2010)

For more information about this blog and the author's two recently published books, please click here  Joe Ortiz web sites and blogs


Anonymous said...

The quotes from eminent Christian scholars should prove to anyone with an open mind that MacPherson has been accurate as well as faithful during his decades of research into pretrib rapture beginnings.

Anonymous said...

This reminds me of two other sets of quotes compiled by MacPherson that everyone should see: "Famous Rapture Watchers" and "Famous Rapture Watchers - Addendum." Both can be found on Google, Yahoo etc. Keep up the great blogging, Bro. Joe; if anyone is the wave of the future and on the cutting edge, it is you!

Anonymous said...

"How can ye believe, who receive glory one of another, and seek not the glory which comes from God alone?"
John 5:44

Receiving glory from one another ...

Whoever read the ordiginal Darby Writings (Collected Writings and The Bible Tresuary) knows, MacPherson is wrong. But it takes time and labour to do so. It's much moore cheaper to build a conviction on second sources like MacPhersons books ... and it's cheap to build reputation by being honoured by others.

Anonymous said...

I feel I must come to the defense of journalist and historian Dave MacPherson who in his decades of research has combed libraries in Britain etc. and discovered many primary documents throwing light on the real origins of the pretribulation rapture idea. It is apparent John has been brainwashed by rabid defenders of pretrib including Thomas Ice, Grant Jeffrey, Tim LaHaye etc. I invite John and others to Google "Pretrib Rapture Diehards," "Thomas Ice (Bloopers)," "X-Raying Margaret," "Edward Irving is Unnerving," "Pretrib Expert John Walvoord Melts Ice," "Pretrib Hypocrisy," "Thieves' Marketing," "Pretrib Rapture Secrecy" and "Pretrib Rapture Dishonesty." Also "Scholars Weigh My Research" (what leading scholars have stated about MacPherson's research). BTW, many of MacPherson's articles can be found on this blog owned by Brother Joe Ortiz who, as a leading member of the media in the Los Angeles area, is to be commended for providing clear instructions for those believers who will be tested in the great tribulation which may well be just around the corner! Martina

Anonymous said...

Speaking of historian Dave MacPherson, those brave enough to go over the greatest collection of "dirty linen" that he has uncovered in the short history of the pretrib rapture should Google "Pretrib Rapture Dishonesty" (previously mentioned by someone) - but tranquilizers should be taken first because Dave (and Joe Ortiz) don't want to be responsible if severe health problems erupt while folks are reading it! Lennie